Intestinal "Piggybacking Lipoma", A Unique Lipoma Composed of Lipoma and Overlying Epithelial Lesions: A Case-control Study and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Lipomas are rare but the most common benign mesenchymal lesions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, composed of mature adipose cells. The "piggybacking lipoma" is formed by lipomas with overlying polypoid epithelial lesions, such as sessile serrated lesion, tubular adenoma, or hyperplastic polyp, and the literature on these lesions is limited. In this study, we systematically investigated the clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic characteristics of these unique lipomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective study of gastrointestinal tract lipomas diagnosed from 2016-2021. Those with concurrent polypoid epithelial or mesenchymal lesions during the same endoscopic episode were included and reviewed in this study, and the lipomas were classified as "piggybacking lipoma" or "non-piggybacking lipoma" depending on whether the concurrent lesion was overlying the lipoma or was at a different location in the intestine. Demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were obtained from electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 100 lipomas with concurrent epithelial or mesenchymal lesions were included in this study. Among them, 21 cases were classified as "piggybacking lipoma" and 79 were classified as "non-piggybacking lipoma". Patients with piggybacking lipomas showed a female predilection, and were more likely to be symptomatic and less likely to exhibit classic endoscopic features of lipoma. Histologically, the piggybacking polyps showed overlying sessile serrated lesions (SSL) (76.2%) and tubular adenoma (TA) (19%), whereas the non-piggybacking group had differing characteristic lesions with TA (57.5%) and SSL (6.0%). CONCLUSION: Piggybacking lipomas are rare lipomas with overlying polypoid epithelial lesions, most commonly SSL. They present different clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic features compared to non-piggybacking lipomas.

Study of pre-operative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in urothelial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), as an indicator of heightened systemic inflammatory response, predicts increased disease burden and poor oncological outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). The study was undertaken with an aim to evaluate the association of NLR with clinicopathological variables and survival outcomes. METHODS: A total of 80 patients of UC were enrolled in the current retrospective study. Pre-operative NLR (within one month prior to the procedure), patient age, sex, tumour grade, pathological stage, recurrence free survival (RFS), progression free survival (PFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were recorded. We chose a cut-off value of 2.7 for NLR and patients were divide into two groups (NLR <2.7 and ≥2.7). RESULTS: NLR ≥2.7 was significantly associated with advanced tumour stage (p=0.001), but not with tumour grade (p=0.116). Progression (p=0.032) and death rates (p=0.026) were high in patients with NLR ≥2.7. Mean RFS (p=0.03), PFS (p=0.04) and CSS (p=0.04) were reduced in patients with NLR ≥2.7. On univariate analysis, NLR ≥2.7 predicted worse RFS (HR=2.928, p=0.007), PFS (HR=3.180, p=0.006) and CSS (HR=3.109, p=0.016). However, it was not an independent predictor of outcomes on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour stage and grade are the only independent predictors of RFS, PFS and CSS. High NLR at a cut-off value of ≥2.7 is associated with advanced pathological stage, but does not have an independent predictive value for RFS, PFS and CSS.